The codes do not match each other
The SCoC, the invoice and the customs entry disagree. Fix the code once and use it everywhere.
The HS code decides the regulation, the certificate and the tests. Send the code with product details and we confirm the requirement in writing.

Send with your code:
Quick Answer
The Harmonized System classifies traded products. Customs worldwide use it, and Saudi Arabia uses it twice: at the border for duty, and inside SABER to map a product to its technical regulation.
That second use is what makes the code matter for certification. When your importer registers a product, the HS code is the field that brings back the regulatory answer: regulated, and a PCoC is needed — or non-regulated, needing only a shipment certificate.
So settle the classification before you commission testing. Testing to the wrong regulation spends money on evidence nobody will use.
Three routes, worth using in this order.
We review your product, verify the HS code and confirm the exact technical regulation, route and document list — usually within one working day. No charge for the assessment.
If you do not have a code yet, work from the product rather than a keyword search.
The first six digits of an HS code are international — the same in Riyadh, Mumbai and Rotterdam. Beyond that each country adds national detail, and Saudi Arabia is no exception.
The regulation mapping turns on the international part plus the product’s characteristics. The full national code is what appears on your customs declaration, and it must match what your certificate covers.
| Digits | Level | What it identifies |
|---|---|---|
| 1–2 | Chapter | Broad product family — e.g. 85, electrical machinery |
| 3–4 | Heading | Product group within the chapter |
| 5–6 | Subheading | Specific product type, identical worldwide |
| 7 onward | National code | Saudi tariff detail used at customs |
Regulated products cluster in a predictable set of chapters. If your goods fall in one of these, plan for a PCoC until it is confirmed otherwise.
This shows where requirements commonly arise — it is not a determination. Products in other chapters are regulated too, and not everything in these chapters is.
| Chapter | Covers | Typical SABER products |
|---|---|---|
| 39 & 40 | Plastics and rubber | Plastic pipes, household plastics, tyres |
| 68–70 | Stone, ceramics, glass | Ceramic tiles, safety glass, gypsum board |
| 72–73 | Iron and steel | Steel pipes, sections, fasteners, flanges |
| 84 | Machinery | Pumps, compressors, air conditioners |
| 85 | Electrical and electronics | LED lighting, cables, switches, batteries |
| 87 | Vehicles and parts | Spare parts, brake pads, filters |
| 94 | Furniture and lighting | Furniture, mattresses, luminaires |
| 95 | Toys and sports goods | Toys, bicycles, sporting goods |
Four patterns account for most HS-related problems at the Saudi border.
The SCoC, the invoice and the customs entry disagree. Fix the code once and use it everywhere.
Customs classifies the goods that arrive, not the goods described. A code chosen to avoid a regulation is the fastest route to a held container.
Common with machinery and automotive components. It changes both the duty and the conformity requirement.
A container with several product types needs each product classified correctly and covered by its own conformity.
Three of these let you move immediately. The fourth saves the most money.
The code falls inside a published Saudi technical regulation.
A Product Certificate is required from a conformity body approved for that regulation, supported by test evidence — then a Shipment Certificate per consignment.
No published technical regulation covers the code.
No product certificate is issued. A Shipment Certificate is still required for each consignment, raised on a self-declaration basis.
The code sits with SFDA, MIM or another regulator rather than with SASO.
A different process applies. Filing these on SABER wastes weeks before the right process starts.
The product plausibly sits in more than one heading, and the headings differ in regulation.
Screening cannot settle this. It escalates to a classification opinion reasoned under the interpretative rules.
A code on its own cannot be checked against a product nobody has seen. These inputs are what make the answer reliable.
Six steps, and step two is the one most screenings skip — testing whether the inherited code describes the goods at all.
We start from the code you hold, whoever supplied it — your forwarder, your importer, your ERP or the factory.
Does the heading actually describe the goods? Most bad codes are inherited and never questioned.
The code is checked against the published Saudi technical regulations to establish whether it is regulated, and under which one.
SFDA and MIM scope is checked too, so a product that never belonged on SABER is caught early.
You receive the regulation, the standards it cites, the certificate type and the marking obligations.
Where the product could sit in two headings with different regulations, we say so and quote the classification opinion.
A written result you can act on and, if it comes to it, show to a reviewer or an importer.

The code is the cheapest thing in the file to verify and the most expensive thing to get wrong.
A certificate raised under the wrong code attests to the wrong regulation. The assessment behind it has to be redone.
Testing follows the regulation the code points at. A wrong code buys a valid report nobody wants.
The same code drives the tariff. An understated rate found later is a reassessment with interest.
Food, cosmetics and medical goods belong to SFDA. Screening catches this before an account and a fee are spent.
Energy labels and G-Mark attach to particular codes. Miss the trigger and the goods arrive certified but wrongly marked.
A code sits in your ERP and on every invoice. Unchecked, one bad classification replicates across a year.
Most exporters need the check. A minority genuinely need the opinion — worth knowing which you are before you pay for either.
What to do with the result, and where to go if the code turns out to be arguable.
Screening and regulation scope. Classification method is covered on the HS code assessment page.
The code is screened against the published Saudi technical regulations. Inside one means a Product Certificate and a Shipment Certificate are required. Outside one means no product certificate, but a shipment certificate is still needed on a self-declaration basis. We return the answer in writing, with the regulation named.
Largely, yes. SABER maps HS codes to technical regulations. If your code falls under one, the product is regulated and needs both certificates. If not, it is non-regulated and needs only a shipment certificate. The status is verified against current data before it is confirmed.
No. A check takes the code you already have and tells you what it triggers. An assessment determines what the code should be, under the interpretative rules. A check that runs into an arguable code escalates to an assessment.
It is a starting point, not an authority. Forwarder codes are chosen for clearance convenience and are often at the wrong depth for regulation. Screening tests whether the heading describes your product before anything is built on it.
It can change your duty and make customs expect conformity documents you have not prepared. That is a frequent cause of delays and re-inspection, so confirm the code before shipment.
Yes — a Shipment Certificate for each consignment, on a self-declaration basis. You do not need a Product Certificate, because there is no regulation to certify against. Get the status confirmed in writing.
A straightforward code is usually answered within a working day or two of receiving the description, photographs and datasheet. An arguable code takes longer, because it becomes a reasoned opinion.
The code, the product details and a datasheet is enough. You get the regulation, the certificate type and the marking obligations in writing — usually within a working day or two.