Pre-Shipment Compliance Review

One review, before the container is booked

Send the draft invoice, the packing list, the conformity certificate and the label artwork. You get back a written go or no-go, every document disagreement shown side by side, and a fix list addressed to whoever can actually resolve it — while the goods are still at origin and everything is cheap to change.

Invoice, packing list, certificate and declaration fanned out for reconciliation before booking

To review a consignment we need:

  • Draft invoice & packing list
  • Conformity certificate
  • Label artwork or carton photos
Send a Shipment for Review

Every finding is cheap until the vessel sails

Consignments are rarely stopped because the goods are wrong. They are stopped because four documents that each look correct do not say the same thing, or because a certificate that is genuinely valid does not name the right consignee or list every model in the container.

None of that is difficult to find. It is only difficult to find late. The whole value of this review is its position in the sequence: after the file is complete enough to check, and before anything has been committed that costs money to reverse.

What the review gives you

One document, written to be forwarded to a supplier unedited — not a conversation about risk.

A written go or no-go

One line at the top of the report: ship, ship after these fixes, or do not book yet. Everything below it is the reasoning. We do not hedge the headline.

Document reconciliation

Consignee, HS code, model, description, quantity, weight and value compared across every document in the set, with each disagreement shown side by side.

Certificate validity check

Whether the conformity document is live, whether it names your consignee, and whether the models it lists are the models actually in the container.

Label and marking findings

Mandatory Arabic content, origin marking and category-specific markings checked against the regulation the product falls under — while artwork can still be corrected.

Classification cross-check

Confirmation that the code on the draft invoice is the code the certificate was issued against, and that it is defensible at Saudi tariff depth.

A fix list with owners

Each finding assigned to the party who can actually resolve it — supplier, importer, forwarder or us — with what has to change and in what order.

How the review runs

Seven steps, in this order, because each one depends on the answer before it. The engagement closes on the re-check, not the first report.

  1. Intake

    You send the draft set as it stands. Incomplete is fine and is itself a finding; we would rather see the real file than a tidied one.

  2. Classification cross-check

    The declared code is tested against the goods and against the code the certificate was issued under. Everything downstream depends on these being the same code.

  3. Certificate check

    Validity, consignee, scope and model coverage. A live certificate that names the wrong party or omits a variant is the most common single finding.

  4. Document reconciliation

    Invoice, packing list, origin certificate and conformity document read as one statement. Customs will read them that way; we do it first.

  5. Label and artwork review

    Checked against the applicable regulation from artwork files or carton photographs, including the markings that only apply to certain categories.

  6. Findings issued

    The go/no-go, the reconciliation table and the fix list, in one document you can forward to the supplier without rewriting it.

  7. Re-check after fixes

    Corrected documents come back through the same checks. The engagement closes on a clean pass, not on the first report.

The file, as it actually stands

Drafts are fine and gaps are informative. A tidied set hides exactly the things the review exists to find.

Commercial set

  • Draft commercial invoice, as it will be issued
  • Packing list with weights, cartons and marks
  • Certificate of origin, or the draft application
  • Bill of lading draft or booking details, if raised
  • Consignee name and CR as registered in Saudi Arabia

Compliance set

  • Conformity certificate or the filing reference
  • Product certificate and the test reports behind it
  • Model, variant and part-number list for the consignment
  • Declaration of conformity from the manufacturer
  • Any previous customs query on the same product

Physical evidence

  • Label artwork files, or photographs of the printed label
  • Photographs of the finished, marked cartons
  • Shipping marks as applied
  • Product photographs where the model is not obvious from the pack
  • Container stuffing plan, for mixed consignments

What the review usually catches

Six recurring findings. All six are invisible in a document set read one document at a time.

Consignee mismatch

The certificate names a trading name, a previous distributor or a group company rather than the CR the declaration will be lodged under.

A model in the container that is not on the certificate

Usually a suffix change or a variant added late in production. The paperwork is genuine and does not cover part of the shipment.

Three documents, two HS codes

The invoice carries the supplier’s code, the certificate carries another, and nobody compared them until the declaration was lodged.

Arabic content missing or incomplete

Translated marketing copy on the pack, but a mandatory element left out because the translator was never given the requirement.

A certificate that expires mid-voyage

Valid on the day it was checked and not on the day of arrival. Sailing time is part of the validity question and is regularly left out of it.

Quantities that do not reconcile

Packing list cartons against invoice units against certificate quantities. Small discrepancies are the ones that trigger a physical examination.

The same problem, two prices

Identical findings. What changes is where the goods are standing when you learn about them.

Caught here, before booking

  • Documents reissued at origin at no freight cost
  • Artwork corrected before the print run is committed
  • Certificate amended or reissued while the goods are still in the factory
  • A missing model added to the file in the normal queue
  • The sailing moves by days, and only if it has to

Caught at the port of arrival

  • Storage and demurrage accruing daily against the importer
  • Relabelling in a bonded warehouse, if it is permitted at all
  • Retroactive certification running at ordinary speed while charges run
  • Physical examination and the queue that follows it
  • Re-export as the remaining option on goods that cannot be corrected

Six shipments worth checking

A proven route with an unchanged product rarely needs a review. These six are not that.

Sealed export cartons checked against a tablet record in a final pre-dispatch review

First shipment to a new buyer

A new consignee means a new set of details to get wrong, and the first consignment sets the pattern the next ten will copy.

A new SKU on an existing route

The route is proven, the product is not. Added lines are the most common way a clean shipping history acquires its first hold.

Anything changed at the factory

A model suffix, a component, a supplier of a component, a new production site. Any of these can leave the certificate describing the previous version.

A certificate close to expiry

Where validity and arrival date are close together, the check is about the arrival date, not today’s.

Mixed containers

Several product lines, potentially several regulators. The consolidated document set has to work line by line, not on average.

After a previous hold

A consignment held once will be looked at again. The next shipment is the one that has to be unarguable.

A complete document set that still did not cover the container

A consignment that was three days from a booking, with a complete and entirely genuine document set.

  1. What we received

    Draft invoice, packing list, a live conformity certificate and carton photographs. The importer had shipped the same product line twice before without incident.

  2. What reconciled

    Quantities, weights, values and origin all agreed. The certificate was valid, correctly issued and named the right consignee.

  3. What did not

    The packing list carried two part numbers ending in a revision suffix the certificate did not list. The factory had rolled a component change four weeks earlier.

  4. What it would have cost

    Roughly a fifth of the container was not covered. On arrival that is a physical examination, a partial hold and a retroactive amendment with storage running throughout.

  5. What actually happened

    The certificate was amended at origin before booking. The vessel moved by four days, the file cleared normally, and the revision is now on the supplier’s change checklist.

Ten statements that must all be true

This is the check itself. Run it yourself on a simple consignment — the review exists for the ones where you cannot answer point four with certainty.

  1. The HS code on the draft invoice is the code the certificate was issued against.
  2. The conformity document is live and remains valid on the expected arrival date.
  3. The consignee named on the certificate matches the CR on the declaration exactly.
  4. Every model, variant and part number in the container appears in the certificate scope.
  5. Invoice and packing list reconcile on quantity, weight, carton count and value.
  6. The certificate of origin agrees with the invoice on description, quantity and origin.
  7. Mandatory Arabic content and origin marking are on the pack as printed.
  8. Category-specific markings, where the regulation requires them, are present and correct.
  9. Shipping marks match the packing list and the stuffing plan.
  10. Nothing in the file has changed since the last version anyone checked.

Review questions

Scope, timing and turnaround. Regulatory what-applies questions live on the product compliance page.

When should the review be run?

After the goods are made and the documents are drafted, but before freight is booked. That window is where every finding is still cheap to fix: artwork can be reprinted, documents reissued and certificates amended without anything being in transit.

How long does it take?

A single-product consignment with a complete set is usually turned around within one working day. Mixed containers and files with gaps take longer, and we tell you which of the two you have when the set arrives rather than at the end.

Do you need physical access to the goods?

No. The review runs on documents and photographs. Where something can only be settled by looking at the goods — a marking that cannot be read from a photo, a pack that does not match the artwork — we say so and it becomes a separate inspection.

Is this the same as a pre-shipment inspection?

No, and they answer different questions. An inspection looks at the goods: quantity, condition, workmanship. This review looks at the file: whether the documents, the certificate and the labelling agree with each other and with the regulation. Both are useful; only one of them catches a consignee mismatch.

What if the review finds the shipment should not go?

Then that is the report, stated in the first line. It is an uncomfortable message three days before a booking and a much cheaper one than the alternative. The fix list sets out what would have to change for the answer to become yes, and we re-check once it has.

Can you deal with our supplier directly?

Yes, and it is usually faster. Several findings can only be resolved at origin — a reissued certificate, corrected artwork, an amended invoice — and going through a buyer as intermediary adds a day to each round trip.

We use a freight forwarder already. Does this overlap?

Very little. Forwarders check that documents exist and that the booking can be made; the reconciliation between a certificate scope and a packing list sits outside what they are engaged to do. Most of our findings are ones a forwarder would not be expected to look for.

Do you review consignments you did not certify?

Yes. A large share of this work is on files prepared elsewhere, and the review is deliberately sold as a standalone check. If the file is sound we say so — that is a legitimate outcome, not a failed engagement.

Can this be a standing arrangement rather than a one-off?

For regular shippers it usually should be. A standing gate on every consignment costs less per shipment, and by the third or fourth review most of the recurring findings have been engineered out of the supplier’s process entirely.

Send the draft set and get a go or no-go in writing

Invoice, packing list, certificate and label artwork is enough. Most single-product consignments are answered within one working day.